Wissensdatenbank Wirtschaftsrecht

aktuelles Dokument: IntUrhRWorks
image4
image3
image2
image1
 Alle Kategorien:
  Forschungsdatenbank
  Lehrveranstaltungen
  Lexikon
  Literatur
  Arb R Literatur
  B W L Literatur
  Buchfuehrung Literatur
  Common Law Literatur
  E V T Z Literatur
  Energie R Literatur
  Europa R Literatur
  Gew R S Literatur
  Informations R Literatur
  Infotech Literatur
  Insolvenz R Literatur
  Internat W R Literatur
  Jur Arbeitstechnik Lit...
  Jur Methodenlehre Lite...
  Marketing Literatur
  Mediation Literatur
  Oeffentliches R Litera...
  Personalmanagement Lit...
  Projektmanagement Lite...
  Soz R Literatur
  Sprache Literatur
  Staats R Literatur
  Steuer R Literatur
  Straf R Literatur
  Unternehmens R Literatur
  Urh R Literatur
  V W L Literatur
  Vertragsgestaltungs Li...
  Verw R Literatur
  Voelker R Literatur
  Vortragstechnik Litera...
  W I P R Literatur
  Wettbew R Literatur
  Z P O Literatur
  Insolvenzrecht Litera...
  Rechtsgebiete
  Rechtsprechung
  Service
  Studium F H S
  Wissensmanagement
ich war hier: CategoryVortragstechnikLiteratur » CategoryVerordnungenLexikon » CategoryLiteratur » IntUrhRWorks

Version [31244]

Dies ist eine alte Version von IntUrhRWorks erstellt von Jorina Lossau am 2013-06-17 09:48:11.

 

Internationaler Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht II

Teil 2 - Copyrightable Works


Attachments
File Last modified Size
IntUrhRExclusion.jpg 2023-10-06 18:36 40Kb
IntUrhRWorkUSC.jpg 2023-10-06 18:36 42Kb

The scope of copyright is defined in 17 U.S.C. § 102 in accordance to most copyright laws. There is a general definition of “works” that need mainly two criteria: originality and fixation. Additionally, there is a catalogue of works “the listing is “illustrative and not limitative,”” (Copyright Law Revision – Senate Report No. 94-473 (1975), p. 52).



§ 102 - Subject matter of copyright: In general

(a) Copyright protection subsists, in accordance with this title, in original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, now known or later developed, from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine or device. Works of authorship include the following categories:

(1) literary works;
(2) musical works, including any accompanying words;
(3) dramatic works, including any accompanying music;
(4) pantomimes and choreographic works;
(5) pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works;
(6) motion pictures and other audiovisual works;
(7) sound recordings; and
(8) architectural works.

(b) In no case does copyright protection for an original work of authorship extend to any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery, regardless of the form in which it is described, explained, illustrated, or embodied in such work.

§ 103 - Subject matter of copyright: Compilations and derivative works

(a) The subject matter of copyright as specified by section 102 includes compilations and derivative works, but protection for a work employing preexisting material in which copyright subsists does not extend to any part of the work in which such material has been used unlawfully.

(b) The copyright in a compilation or derivative work extends only to the material contributed by the author of such work, as distinguished from the preexisting material employed in the work, and does not imply any exclusive right in the preexisting material. The copyright in such work is independent of, and does not affect or enlarge the scope, duration, ownership, or subsistence of, any copyright protection in the preexisting material.

 (image: https://hssm.hqedv.de/uploads/IntUrhRWorks/IntUrhRWorkUSC.jpg)

Of the two fundamental criteria one is a positive definition, the other is an exclusive one. They both represent the two main principle of copyright protection. On one hand’s side, merely individual works (meaning original works) deserve protection as there is a specific improvement by the creator that has a value for the society and that is worth an incentive as exclusive rights. On the other hand’s side, the criteria “fixation” excludes protection of mere ideas as there is no progress if they are not fixed in any medium. The need for the fixation of ideas avoids the monopolization of ideas.


Diese Seite wurde noch nicht kommentiert.
Valid XHTML   |   Valid CSS:   |   Powered by WikkaWiki